Inherit the Wind
Reviewed by Holly Bartges
Pure and simple, The Modern Muse Theatre Company’s production of Jerome Lawrence and Robert E.
Lee’s Inherit The Wind at the Bug Theatre should not be missed by anyone old enough to experience theatre.
 |
| Reverend Jeremiah Brown (Paul Page) calls down fire and brimstone
on his daughter, Rachel Brown (Kelly Burke) in Modern Muse Theatre Company’s production of
Inherit the Wind. |
Why?
- Because of the content of the play along with its rhyme and reason to have been written in the first place;
- Because of the intricate set design by James Holly with its air of simplicity, practicality matched only to its ethereal thought provoking detail;
- Because of its stunning creative direction by Stephen J. Lavezza;
- Because of its jaw dropping awesome talented cast that individually stands out melding into an intricate maze of unity.
Overheard after Saturday’s opening night production, someone asked, “But where does Scopes
come into this? It’s based on the Scopes Monkey Trail. Who is Scopes?”
2005 celebrates the 80th year of the famous trial in Dayton, Tennessee when John Scopes was accused of
breaking the Butler Act passed earlier that year restricting the teaching of evolution in state-funded
schools. He had the intellectual audacity to quote from Charles Darwin’s “Origins of Species.”
The trial became an international sensation with two famous lawyers William Jennings Bryan for the
prosecution and Clarence Darrow for the defense. Nearly 200 reporters descended on the small Tennessee
town including H. L. Mencken of The Baltimore Evening Sun, which helped forge Scopes’ defense.
Lawrence and Lee wrote their play in 1950, not finding its way to Broadway until 1955. A 1960 movie
directed by Stanley Kramer, starring Spencer Tracy and Frederic March is readily available in video
stores, and the play is frequently performed around the country. The play and the movie differ greatly
in points of view and emphasis.
Originally, the playwrights weren’t interested in coming down on one side or the other of
creationism or evolution. They used the famed Monkey Trail to go after, in their eyes, a much bigger
problem. The 1950s brought the McCarthy era, and a confined approach to the right of the individual
to think freely. Thirty years had gone by since the trial. And it was a perfect platform to explore
the growing anxiety and anti-intellectual attitude permeating the country.
They took great liberties with historical documentation. Names were changed: Clarence Darrow becomes
Henry Drummond, awesomely performed by William Denis. William Jennings Bryan becomes Matthew Harrison
Brady, with a jaw dropping performance by Louis Schaefer. John Scopes becomes Bertram Cates captured
with confidence, defiance, questioning, and doubtfulness by Josh Hartwell.
E. K. Hornbeck of the Baltimore Herald represents the famed reporter, Mencken, and is masterfully
portrayed with an air of curiosity, observation, and playful arrogant cynicism by Matt Sheahan.
Paul Page wears the ministerial collar tightly secured around his neck as the Reverend Jeremiah Brown
who controls the fictional town of Hillsboro with choking hell, fire and brimstone taunting power. Page
is priceless wearing the cloak of righteous moral indignity snug around his neck strangling the entire town.
Well, not all the town. Howard, a young student, wanting desperately to flirt with life and ideas,
grabs attention through the expertise of Max Posner. Even when the entire cast fills the stage, Posner
keeps Howard alive with unabashed little boy antics in sharp definition.
Quiet confusion peaks trough the circus atmosphere created in this small town, with Rachel Brown,
magnificently portrayed by Kelly Burke. The daughter of Reverend Brown, a teacher in the school system,
and Cates’ fiancé, Burke molds her with silken threads in obedient trepidation to her
overbearing father. Rachel, a fictitious character inserted into the historical files, becomes the
voice of the playwrights and the point of the play.
In the beginning she begs Cates to recant his statements. The wall of discontent is laid brick by
brick between them. After the trial she leaves her father’s unhappy, pious household, taking a
stand on her own for the first time in her life. In reflection, she says to Drummond, ”You see,
I haven’t really thought very much. I was always afraid of what I might think, so it seemed safer
not to think at all. But now I know. A thought is like a child inside our body. It has to be born …
Bad or good, it doesn’t make any difference. The ideas have to come out like children.”
The right to think, the right to be right and the right to be wrong permeate the essence of this play.
A quick glance at our political and sociological landscape tells us the value of Inherit the Wind
is probably more pertinent today than when it was first written.
Patty Mintz Figel grabs Brady’s wife, Sara by the overprotective, nitpicking, hovering horns of
ownership. Figel owns Sara, who owns Brady with a mothering clutch.
Denise Perry-Olson wears the coat of righteous indignation as Mrs. Krebs. She wears the coat with
hilarious moral authority, She knows what’s right, and it is she.
Jim Zieger wears the legal robe of the Judge with realistic judge-like mannerisms and political
vulnerability side by side.
That’s one of the obvious points in this production. Each actor owns their character, allowing
each one to stand out in the crowd. No small feat for any production.
The juxtaposition of animation in the courtroom to the jury wearing masks smacks as a brilliant
concept of cross current ideas being played out by Drummond and Brady. The stage belongs to Denis
and Schaefer with their opposing concepts, commanding lawyer-type demeanor, paunchy stance, and
tripping up arrogance, while the courtroom observers maintain individual nuances of squirms,
wiggles, and honest overt reactions allowing them to stand out. No one actor becomes a face in
the crowd, a body on stage. They are as intricate to the main body as an index finger to a hand.
Lavezza’s stage direction is a visual feast of choreographic wonderment. Planting actors in
the audience representing potential witnesses for Drummond who are rejected by Brady for their
scientific background engages the audience to be part of rather than merely spectators of something
that happened “once upon a time ago.” When he calls upon Zoologist, Dr. Keller to explain
evolution, Brady deems zoology irrelevant. Desperate for witnesses, Drummond requests Brady take the
stand, hammering him with Biblical literalism. When Brady collapses from a heart attack, Hornbeck’s
incessant ridicule prompts Drummond to reprimand him insisting Brady was a once great man who had ceased
to move forward.
There are profound touching moments. In the middle of the trial Brady addresses Drummond, “We
use to be old friends. What happened?” Thoughtfully, Drummond responds, “You moved away by
standing still.”
Dressed in body suits, the play opens with three actors symbolically portraying Adam, Eve, Satan a
nd the seductive Tree of Knowledge. It carries a punch as tightly woven as the last few second with
Drummond weighing the Bible and The Origin of Species slamming them together.
Inherit The Wind marks the inauguration of the professional Modern Muse Theatre Company, into the
Denver theatre world. Inherit The Wind is also presented in association with Global Arts Ltd.
a non-profit organization promoting positive change by “illuminating ideas, provoking thought,
and stimulating discussion.” Inherit The Wind does everything promised and then some.
Let it tease and stretch the imagination to compare the movie, the play, and the historical facts.
Let the mind play with ideas, and be glad the mind can play, even if it has to ask “Where does
Scopes come in?” Whatever, however, do not miss this knockout show.
|